By JW Bryan:
Dear President Trump:
I heartily commend you for your stand on the Wall and I fully support you on possibly declaring a national emergency to get the wall built.
If that fails, I would go even further. I would declare martial law for the simple reason that the rule of law has broken down. What the congressional leadership is doing equates with stopping the Commander in Chief from protecting the people of America by preventing him from repelling an invasion. This is what is happening regardless of all the lies by the socialist left to the contrary.
The massive deception concerning this issue goes back a long way and is so voluminous as to prevent me going into it to any appreciable extent. However, there are a few things that could cast the light upon other things not formerly seen.
The first deception we have to see through is that it isn’t all about Trump. The prevailing mindset seems to be that all the obstruction by the Democrats to getting anything done constructively is due to their hatred for you Mr. President.
The truth is…it wouldn’t matter who was President if our leader was engaged in defeating or even holding back the forces whose goal is the destruction of America and the principles she was founded upon. Since you, Mr. President, are engaged in these endeavors of attempting to protect us by defeating those who are out to destroy us, then you are the target of all those forces.
The Democrats, along with their fellow-travelers in the Republican ranks, are not the end of the forces who are bent on destroying America. The main force behind all this continues to remain hidden. In fact, it is seldom referred to in connection with what is happening in our country. Few Americans know this group.
The force I am referring to is the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which was organized for the specific purpose of incrementally changing the United States so that we could be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.
In his book, “FDR, My Exploited Father-in-Law,” Curtis Dall stated, “I could have had my seat at that table,” and he gave the address of the Pratt House – the headquarters of the CFR. He then added, “But first I had to consider loyalty to my country, so I had to decline.”
This was in 1939 and he said, “I was here in 1939 when these men with their attaché cases (he was describing CFR members), descended upon Washington. Then he went on to reveal how he could have been a part of it.
Curtis Dall, who happened to be FDR’s Son-in-law was courted by the CFR.
He was sought out by high-ranking people both in government as well as in international finance and banking, and could have had his seat at that table in the Pratt House. He could have been a member along with his 200 or so contemporaries who made up the beginning of the most powerful and prestigious American organization of all time.
However, he was not deceived. He was able to see through the deception regarding the CFR goals. Many more either could not see the deception or were willing participants.
Things have not changed Mr. President. Many still fall into that category and I hate to say this Sir, since I am in agreement with what you are trying to accomplish, but it appears you are not knowledgeable of the CFR’s goals.
During your campaign and after you were elected, you spoke very disparagingly about the trade deal known as NAFTA and what a disaster it was. You said you were going to renegotiate it to our benefit or you would pull completely out of it.
It has been renegotiated but certainly not to our benefit. What it has been replaced with, the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), is even worse, thanks to our trade representative, Mr. Robert Lighthizer. He is a longtime member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations. No doubt he is being applauded by the CFR, as well as the socialist Democrats and Republicans for his genius in involving us in an entanglement, which if ratified could mean the end of our sovereignty, our life, liberty, and property.
Richard Haass, President of the CFR, was immediately in favor of the agreement. The day after the USMCA was revealed, he tweeted that the agreement is “NAFTA plus 10 to 20 percent.” A day later he tweeted, “USMCA is NAFTA plus the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) plus a few tweaks.”
Mr. President, since that is the view of the Chairman of the CFR, and since the CFR goal is to incrementally change the United States (which it has been doing for nearly a century) and merge us with the Soviet Union into a world government, then it follows that the USMCA plays into that plan.
Let’s go back to 1953. According to James Perloff in his book, Shadows of Power, “in that year a measure known as the Bricker Amendment was introduced in Congress. It stipulated that no treaty signed by the U.S. could override the Constitution or infringe on the rights guaranteed Americans. It was born out of the painful retrospect of the Yalta Conference and the UN Charter.
Foreign Affairs, the official publication of the CFR, ran a 19-page denunciation of the Bricker Amendment as its lead article in October, 1953. President Eisenhower toed the CFR line calling the backers of amendment, “nuts and crackpots.” Biographer Stephen Ambrose wrote, “Eisenhower used all his persuasive powers – in stag dinners, at meetings, in private, in correspondence, even on the golf course – to kill the amendment. And killed it was.”
There’s much more according to Mr. Perloff in Shadows of Power, “Also in 1953, Congress established the Reece Committee to investigate tax-free foundations. For what was the first and last time, the CFR came under official scrutiny.”
The Committee’s findings stated:
In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisors to government and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote “internationalism” in a particular sense – a form directed toward “world government” and a derogation of American “nationalism.
And there’s more:
In the fall of 1953, Norman Dodd, Director of research for the Reese Committee, was invited to the headquarters of the Ford Foundation by its president, H. Rowan Gaither a CFR member. According to Dodd, Gaither told him, “Mr. Dodd, all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience, either in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS),( the predecessor to the CIA) or the European Economic Administration, with directives from the White House. We operate under those directives here. Would you like to know what those directives are?” Dodd replied that he would. Gaither said, “The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”
The source of this segment about Norman Dodd and the president of the Ford Foundation was Richard Rovere, “The American Establishment,” Esquire, May 1962, p. 107.
Mr. President, there is a pattern here of how the CFR, along with its interlocking intermediary organizations, manages to manipulate the operations of government in a way which inadvertently results in it being incrementally changed to what is planned.
This is why you and your agenda have been so despicably and relentlessly targeted by the globalist left and many of the right, but that is only what is seen. What is not seen is what goes on behind the scenes. What was going on back in 1953 is only a smidgen of what is being done now.
According to Dan Smoot in his book, “The Invisible Government,” in 1953 the CFR only had maybe a thousand to twelve hundred members. Now the membership numbers up to six thousand. Based on what has been reported and not by “fake news” or the other so-called legitimate media, approximately 500 to 600 of those were active in the government during the previous administration. I highly doubt any of them have been removed.
We can expect all of these enemy agents to continue in what they were involved in to further the objectives of the organization of which they are members.
There’s a simple reason why your administration is having trouble getting things accomplished the way you want them. Some of these enemy agents are in very high positions where they make and carry out policy. How they got there is the nub of the problem as your advisors suggested them.
The biggest mistake is keeping Robert Lighthizer as Trade Representative. Even if you didn’t know anything about the CFR, which seems true, if you had taken a serious look at the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP), other than what was on the surface, it would have given you deeper insight into what he is all about. Unfortunately, it is likely your advisors, whoever they might be, advised you to keep him.
Then there’s this appointee for Attorney General, William Barr. I had some questions about him even before I read an article by Kelleigh Nelson, “Mueller’s Good Squads: Injustice, Destruction and Devastation,” published in News with Views and Capitol Hill Outsider, in which she pointed out that Barr said he had confidence in the special council when he was first appointed and added, “I still have that confidence today.”
The article went on to ask, “who advises President Trump regarding important positions? Why? Because, God help us, the nominee for Attorney General has been greeted by applause by both Democrats and Republicans, and that is bloody worrisome!”
In his book, ROBERT MUELLER Errand Boy for the New World Order, Louisiana State Senator John Milkovich chronicles Mueller’s actions over the last 30 years. While it tells us a lot about him that we only suspected, it also tells us much about William Barr.
In Chapter 12 of Senator Milkovich’s book, Mueller’s World: A Moral Inversion, he states:
Mueller’s work of the last 30 years speaks for itself. And that work includes cover-ups he led, and those in which he lent a hand; crimes he concealed and criminals for which he covered up; investigations he obstructed and victims he abused.
In one way or another, Mueller has left his unmistakable imprint on, the federal protection of Mafia Kingpin Whitey Bulger and his gang in Boston and keeping one or more innocent men in prison to rot.
You can also read Congressman Louie Gohmert’s 15,500 word “Mueller Unmasked,” available on the Congressman’s website.
Mr. President, I wish I had an opportunity to speak with you especially about those who are your enemies and are masquerading as your friends.
More to come in Part 4.
© Copyright by J. W. Bryan, 2019. All rights reserved.
Email J.W: email@example.com