Rubio Must Disqualify Himself from High Office

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

By JB Williams:

If so-called “constitutionalists” were better acquainted with the Constitution (Charters of Freedom), they would not be supporting Marco Rubio for an office he is not eligible to hold and they would have already removed Barack Hussein Obama from the office he currently holds fraudulently.


Marco Rubio is in the unique position to solve our nation’s greatest problem, to remove a foreign agent currently assaulting America from within the Oval Office and set the nation back on a constitutional course towards freedom and liberty. Rubio has an opportunity to be a true American hero. Will he be?

Because Rubio was dragged into the political spotlight by Tea Party folks in desperate search of new conservative leadership, and because he shares in common with Obama, constitutional ineligibility for the offices of president and vice president under Article II requirements, he is uniquely positioned to bring down the most anti-American regime to ever hold political power in the United States.

Unlike “birthers” who are trying to disqualify Obama on the basis of his unconfirmed place of birth (native born status), which is still in question due to Obama’s fraudulent efforts to hide his real past and true identity, using nondisclosure and forged documents to remain a total mystery, — true “constitutionalists” who have studied the matter completely and allowed the facts to emerge without partisan purpose, know the whole truth.

1) The foundations for America are stated in the preamble to the Declaration of Independence. Pay particular attention to the parts highlighted.

IN CONGRESS, July 4, 1776.

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”

Contrary to contemporary teachings by revisionists, the legal precepts for everything our Founders created is NOT “British common law” which we separated from via the Declaration and the American Revolution. It is “The laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” as stated in the preamble to our nation’s founding document, The Declaration. Just as freedom and liberty are “natural rights” inalienable by men, so is the right of Natural Born Citizenship.

2) Revisionists claim that Natural Born Citizen is not defined in the Constitution. However, the US Constitution does not have a definitions section; therefore, it provides no definition for any of the words or terms used in that document. Of course, as the Charters of Freedom were written in plain simple English so that any citizen could read and comprehend their rights and the limited functions of the government bodies they were to form, no definitions were needed. Everyone alive at the time knew the true meaning of every word and every term, including Natural Born Citizen. But 236 years later, dumbed down by revisionist propaganda, Americans may have to do a little homework to rediscover basic truths.

3) During that period in history, the framing of the Charters of Freedom, our Founders left a perfect record of their concerns and intents in the Federalist Papers. Anyone not able to comprehend the simple English carefully crafted in the Charters of Freedom can study the thoughts behind those words in the Federalist Papers. If you do not know the Federalists Papers, you do not know the Constitution.

4) There is no guess-work or ambiguity… We know from reading the correspondences of our Founders, that they borrowed the concepts for the Charters of Freedom (Natural Law – Laws of Nature – God’s Law – inalienable Law of Nations) — from the internationally recognized authority on the subject at the time, Vattel, recorded in French and later translated to English, The Law of Nations, written on the inalienable laws of nature respected by all nations and inescapable by man. [Most of the Founding Fathers were as fluent in French as they were English.] Included, was the term Natural Born Citizen, a citizen by the laws of nature, not the laws of man, in fact, inalienable by the laws of man.

In Vattel’s Law of Nations, he defines the term Natural Born Citizen, not in one sentence, but in several sections, 211 – 233 of Book One. One truly seeking the truth about our Charters of Freedom and Natural Born Citizenship should read the entire Law of Nations, it is a brilliant work on Natural Law and it is in fact the cornerstone of the Charters of Freedom created by our Founders.

But in short, Vattel defines Natural Born Citizen as follow;

NOTE: “Birthers” mistakenly (or intentionally) cherry-pick a single sentence from several sections on the subject, discarding all else, including the actual definition. – “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” – This is NOT the definition of Natural Born Citizen. It is only a general statement affirming that natives are born in country and naturals are born of citizen parents.

Vattel goes on to define Natural Born Citizen and the reasoning behind it…

*  “As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.”

**  “The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.”

***  “I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

This is why Barack Hussein Obama is a total fraud, constitutionally ineligible for office. Unfortunately, so is Marco Rubio, among others.

If Marco Rubio is the great “American Son” he portrays himself to be, the great young constitutionally conservative leader that so many Tea Party folks hope that he is, he must take a stand for the US Constitution and America right now, as only he can do.

Because many of his loyal followers have such high hopes for his political future, Marco Rubio can secure that future by taking the stand that only he is positioned to take right now.

Unless and until so-called “constitutionalists” get Article II right, they can forget every right they think they have….because if Article II does not exist in force or affect, neither does any other part of those founding documents that protect the Natural Rights of all American citizens.

I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and become the great leader he wants to be, the leader so many believe him to be. I call upon Marco Rubio to stand and tell ALL Americans that he is ineligible for the offices of president and vice president, as the natural born son of a Father who was a citizen of Cuba (not the United States) at the time of his birth.

Man-made statutes generously gave Rubio and many others like him, American citizenship, via the 14th Amendment, our immigration and naturalization amendment governing the citizenship rights of immigrants through naturalization, or native born rights.

Rubio is a citizen of the United States by way of man-made laws, not Natural Law.

Likewise, no matter whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya, his natural birth Father was at no time in his life a citizen of the United States. Therefore, Obama’s Father could not confer to Barack Hussein Obama II that which he did not possess, U.S. Citizenship.

Marco Rubio can solve this entire issue and much more. He can stop Obama’s Marxist march off the cliff and save the country he claims to care about deeply, as well as freedom and liberty in America. He can do so by standing up before the nation and the world, proclaiming himself ineligible for high office and demanding that Barack Hussein Obama be immediately removed from office and charged with high treason for the most horrific fraud ever perpetrated on the American public and the world.

If Rubio refuses to do so, he is NOT what so many had hoped. He will be nothing more than just another political fraud seeking personal gain at the expense of the US Charters of Freedom and the future of freedom and liberty, not just here, but throughout the free world.

If Article II no longer matters, nothing in the Charters of Freedom matters anymore.

I call upon Marco Rubio to take a stand and end this nightmare. Stand and tell the people the truth Mr. Rubio, or become just another disappointment to the people, pandering to the captive Tea Party audience but no less complicit in the massive fraud.

DO IT NOW… Before a second fraudulent inauguration!

I have sent this call for action directly to Marco Rubio and I call upon you to do the same.

© Copyright by JB Williams, 2013. All rights reserved.

JB Williams
About JB Williams 154 Articles
JB Williams is a writer on matters of history and American politics with more than 3000 pieces published over a twenty-year span. He has a decidedly conservative reverence for the Charters of Freedom, the men and women who have paid the price of freedom and liberty for all, and action oriented real-time solutions for modern challenges. He is a Christian, a husband, a father, a researcher, writer and a business owner. He is co-founder of action organizations The United States Patriots Union, a civilian parent organization for The Veteran Defenders of America. He is also co-founder of The North American Law Center, a citizen run investigative legal research and activism organization preparing to take on American's greatest legal battles. Williams receives mail at:


  1. JB has once again shared the inescapable truth of how one becomes a natural born Citizen. I’ll be sharing this widely and sending it to Rubio via website contact and fax. I urge all true Consitutionalists to do the same.

  2. Readers should pay very close attention as comments are posted on this piece. The piece doesn’t only expose Marco Rubio for the fraud he is, it exposes many of his minions as well, who claim to be “constitutionalists” and yet, don’t care about one of the most critical Articles of the Constitution, when it suits their political agenda. People who don’t care about Rubio eligibility don;t care about any other part of the constitution either, though many call themselves “constitutionalists.”

    • The truth has a way of messing up a party’s agenda. Many Tea Party members claim to stand on the constitution but will over look this. They are then no better than what we now have. I want better, I want what the founders set up. When Rubio was running I was a huge Rubio fan encouraging many to vote for him.
      When his name came up as a potential VP candidate I was excited but I had been looking at what the constitution said about eligibility of Pres.& VP and learned what you stated in your piece. Your article does a good job explaining the meaning of the language and how to understand it. Rubio is not eligible. I am sure many are disappointed but it’s the truth. I will also contact him and ask him to show us that he is a true patriot and announce that according to our constitution he can not be Pres.or V.P. because his father was not born in America.

    • Rubio is one of the finest politicians out there and a real asset to the Republican Party. However, JB is absolutely correct–Rubio is NOT qualified, under the US Constitution, to ever become POTUS or VPOTUS.  He and Obama share that in common, although Obama succeeded in illegally circumventing that provision. As great a president as Rubio might have been, it is completely hypocritical for us to support his presidency when we were all over Obama for the same thing. Doesn’t the Constitution matter anymore? Where does it end? Here’s the scary part: When we can so easily nullify one part of the Constitution, it makes it that much easier to nullify it all. God help us!

    • Sorry, Pat, you’re wrong on both your posts… If NBC was no big deal, or just meant Native born, or born “in” the U.S., why bother to write, “Natural Born Citizen” to indicate who might be eligible for President and vic president. The Constitution goes on to describe requirements for senators and congressmen as only being citizens. You think that might have been a typo????? I don’t think so… JB nailed this, and has been writing about this since at least 08 that I know of, and the message is still the same. Obama is not qualified, and neither is Rubio…… Too bad about Rubio not being eligible, because he does like the U.S., whereas, someone’s current potus hate the U.S…………. Jerry (in Tucson)

1 Trackback / Pingback

  1. Ted Cruz the Next Ineligible RNC Darling - Capitol Hill Outsider

Comments are closed.